Photographer Morgan Howarth has filed a federal lawsuit in Indiana against Angie’s List Inc., doing business as Angi, alleging copyright infringement. The complaint accuses Angi of copying and distributing one of Howarth’s registered photographs without permission to promote its home services business online. The case centers on a single copyrighted image titled “1881_Nash_Glickman_Bath_Shower_2_f.jpg,” created in 2015 and registered in early 2016.

PicHowarth, a Washington, D.C.-based photographer with over 25 years of experience, claims the image was used without a license on Angi’s Home Advisor website. According to the suit, he discovered the unauthorized use in June 2024 and attempted to resolve the issue with Angi later that year, but those efforts were unsuccessful.

The complaint, however, contains several noticeable errors, suggesting it may have been compiled using a copy-and-paste approach—likely due to the high volume of similar lawsuits Howarth has filed. Over the past 21 years, he has initiated 133 federal cases, nearly all involving copyright infringement. This places him among a small group of photographers who regularly go to court to protect their creative work.

The U.S. Trademark Office issued the following  217 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in May 2025 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys:

RegistrationNumber Wordmark
7804387 BETTER BEHAVIOR IS JUST A CLICK AWAY
7790432 FNEX
7792386
7795281 FLOYDS DELUXE
7783338

Continue reading

logoCrown Point, IN – Plaintiff Cloudbusters, Inc., a technology company based in Indiana, has filed a lawsuit against multiple parties including a former employee and two Florida-based businesses. The company is alleging theft of trade secrets, breach of contract, and other related claims.

According to the complaint, Cloudbusters accuses its former IT manager, Ryan Tinsley, and the companies Practice42, LLC and The Law Office of Audrey Ehrhardt, PLLC, of orchestrating a plan to take confidential business information for their own benefit.

Cloudbusters states that it had hired Tinsley in 2023 and promoted him to IT Manager, a role in which he had access to sensitive company data, including cybersecurity systems, customer lists, and proprietary tools. The company says Tinsley signed both non-compete and non-disclosure agreements during his employment.

BMI-300x158A group of music publishers and copyright owners—including Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI), Howe Sound Music Publishing LLC, d/b/a Cypress Park Music, House of Cash, Inc., Showbilly Music, Muscle Shoals Sound Publishing Co., Peermusic III Ltd., Sony/ATV Songs LLC, d/b/a Sony/ATV Tree Publishing, Buffalo Prairie Songs, Fame Publishing Company LLC, and Southeastern Publishing LLC—has filed a lawsuit against That Place Bar LLC, and an individual named Scott Coyle. The plaintiffs have made claims of willful copyright infringement, alleging that the bar played or permitted the public performance of songs from the BMI music collection without obtaining the required license.

BMI manages the rights to over 22 million songs and is authorized to grant licenses that allow businesses to play these songs in public. According to the lawsuit, That Place Bar, located in Indianapolis, Indiana and operated by That Place Bar LLC, played music from BMI’s collection without getting the required license. Since March 2024, BMI says it contacted the bar more than 50 times—by phone, email, and mail—to explain the need for a license and to warn them to stop playing the music. These efforts included formal notices ordering them to stop, but the bar allegedly continued to use the music without permission.That-Place

The lawsuit includes seven separate claims of copyright infringement, each involving different songs owned by the plaintiffs. It also states that Scott Coyle, as the manager of the bar, had control over the business and a financial interest in its operation. Therefore, he is also being held responsible.

Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks Corporation has filed a lawsuit against Prime Engineering Industrial Solutions LLC and several people connected to the company. The lawsuit accuses them of using and copying SolidWorks software without permission. SolidWorks claims the company broke copyright laws, bypassed security features meant to prevent unauthorized use, and violated their contract under Massachusetts law.

Pic-1-1SolidWorks is a popular computer-aided design (CAD) software protected by several U.S. copyrights. The company uses special tracking tools that can detect unlicensed use based on device addresses (MAC addresses), location data, email activity, and IP addresses. According to the complaint, these tools found at least 403 instances of unauthorized use on computers tied to Prime Engineering’s offices in Indiana and Arizona. The lawsuit even lists specific computers and links them to named employees and company email addresses.

The complaint says the software was accessed using a tool called “SolidSquad (SSQ),”  which is designed to bypass SolidWorks’ licensing protections, allowing people to use the software without paying Pic-2-1for it. SolidWorks says the individuals involved downloaded, installed, or used the software in ways that clearly broke the license agreement, which doesn’t allow any unauthorized copying or use. The company also claims this wasn’t an accident—the defendants continued using the software even after being asked to stop through multiple cease-and-desist letters.

Glitch Productions Pty Ltd, an Australian animation studio behind hit web series like The Amazing Digital Circus, has filed a lawsuit against various individuals and businesses operating e-commerce stores under various aliases. These stores are accused of selling counterfeit merchandise featuring Glitch’s registered trademarks without permission.

web-pageFounded in 2017, Glitch is known for its distinctive 3D animation style and has built a global fanbase with over 8.5 million YouTube subscribers. Its show The Amazing Digital Circus, created by Gooseworx, became a viral success after its October 2023 debut, amassing hundreds of millions of views and expanding to Netflix in 2024. Glitch sells official merchandise—such as clothing, figures, and posters—through its online store, with trademarks recognized in the U.S. and internationally.

The complaint alleges that the defendants target U.S. consumers, including in Indiana, by running interactive storefronts that accept U.S. dollars, ship domestically, and present counterfeit items as official products. Glitch claims the defendants intentionally copy its branding to mislead buyers and weaken its trademark value. The company states it has not authorized these sellers and that their actions violate its intellectual property rights.

The following is the latest development of a closely watched patent case between Vandor Group, Inc. vs. Batesville Casket Company LLC. (Read background article here.)

Vandor Group, Inc. sued Batesville Casket Company and Batesville Services, saying that a product Batesville made—a cardboard cremation insert called the B-Insert—copied several of Vandor’s patented designs. Vandor’s invention was a foldable cardboard box used to temporarily hold a body. It could fit inside a rental casket for viewings and was designed to fold up for cheaper and easier shipping.

Pic-1-300x208

Vandor

The U.S. Trademark Office issued the following  246 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in April 2025 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys:

Registration Number Wordmark
7747689 MBRACE
7766103 ROLL TO ONE
7764741 ULC DEFENSE QUARTERS BY UNIVERSITY LOFT COMPANY
7762700 N NEWR
7762692 NEWR

Continue reading

Premier Weight Loss, also known as Premier Weight Loss of Indiana, is facing a lawsuit from Eli Lilly and Company. The lawsuit claims Premier has been selling altered versions of Lilly’s FDA-approved drugs, MOUNJARO® and ZEPBOUND®. Lilly accuses Premier of repackaging these medications, removing them from their original packaging, and distributing them in third-party insulin syringes without proper labeling, patient instructions, or safety information. Lilly argues that these altered drugs are unsafe, as they lack essential information like batch numbers and expiration dates, and may not meet FDA-approved dosages or sterility standards.

Lilly points out that Premier’s practices, including splitting auto-injector pens into multiple doses, can result in inconsistent and potentially harmful concentrations. The company also says Premier’s marketing misleads consumers and healthcare providers into believing these altered products are authentic, when they are not. Premier’s use of Lilly’s trademarks in advertisements is also a violation of intellectual property laws, according to the lawsuit.

Lilly argues that these practices pose serious risks to patients, particularly those using the drugs to manage conditions like type 2 diabetes. They believe the unapproved alterations could lead to ineffective treatments or dangerous side effects. The lawsuit aims to stop the sale of these allegedly altered drugs and correct Premier’s supposed false advertising. Lilly is also seeking damages for the purported harm caused by Premier’s actions.

WormHoleRonald Satish Emrit, an alleged resident of Florida and Maryland, has filed legal complaints in both Northern and Southern Indiana courts against six defendants, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the U.S. Department of Commerce, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, the American Institute of Physics, Kennedy Space Center, and the National Science Foundation. He seeks $500 billion in damages, claiming interference with business relations and potential contracts has prevented him from securing patents for his scientific theories.

In his Complaint, Emrit also identifies himself as “Preidential Candidate Number P60005535 and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Seperate (sic) Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 d/b/a United Emrits of America.

Emrit’s work involves concepts in quantum mechanics, astrophysics, and relativity, including ideas about black holes, wormholes, and higher-dimensional geometry. He claims these theories are unique and patentable but have been blocked by bureaucratic hurdles and lack of recognition from scientific and government bodies.

Contact Information