Close

Articles Posted in Patent Infringement

Updated:

Indiana Patent Litigation: Lilly Alleges Infringement, Sues Generic Drugmakers

Indianapolis, Indiana – Patent lawyers for Plaintiffs Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana, Eli Lilly Export S.A. of Geneva, Switzerland and Acrux DDS Pty Ltd. of West Melbourne, Australia initiated patent infringement litigation in the Southern District of Indiana. Defendants are Apotex Corp. of Weston, Florida and Apotex Inc.…

Updated:

Indiana Patent Litigation: Folding Tricycle Alleged to Infringe Patent

Indianapolis, Indiana – Plaintiff Newton Enterprises Ltd. of Kowloon, Hong Kong filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendant Singleton Trading Inc. of Brooklyn, New York committed patent infringement. In this Indiana litigation, Singleton Trading, which does business as Elama and Blue Spotlight, is accused of…

Updated:

Patent Law: Supreme Court Discards Rigid Test for Awarding Enhanced Damages for Patent Infringement

Washington, D.C. – A unanimous decision by the U.S. Supreme Court this week gave district courts more flexibility to award enhanced damage in cases of willful patent infringement. This decision consolidated two patent infringement lawsuits, Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., et al. and Stryker Corp. et al. v.…

Updated:

Indiana Patent Litigation: Infringement of Patented Bottle Caps Alleged in Indiana Lawsuit

Indianapolis, Indiana – Plaintiff Novembal USA, Inc. of Edison, New Jersey filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana. Defendant is Closure Systems International, Inc., of Indianapolis, Indiana. Novembal is in the business of development, production and sale of products associated with the production, processing, packaging and…

Updated:

Indiana Patent Litigation: Second Lawsuit by Lippert Against MORryde and MOR/ryde Filed

South Bend, Indiana – Plaintiffs Lippert Components Manufacturing, Inc. of Elkhart, Indiana and Backsaver International, Inc. d/b/a Gorilla-Lift of Somerset, Kentucky filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the Northern District of Indiana. Defendants are MORryde International, Inc. and MOR/ryde Inc. This lawsuit alleging patent infringement follows another recent lawsuit, also…

Updated:

Indiana Patent Litigation: Lippert Sues Alleging Infringement of Patented RV Components

South Bend, Indiana – Patent attorneys for Plaintiff Lippert Components Manufacturing, Inc. filed an infringement lawsuit against Defendants MORryde International, Inc. and MOR/ryde Inc. All parties are based in Elkhart, Indiana. Plaintiff, a vendor of recreational vehicle components, alleges that Defendants have infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 6,182,401 (“‘401 Patent”), 6,176,045…

Updated:

Indiana Patent Litigation: Bloomington-Based Cook Medical Sued for Patent Infringement

Indianapolis, Indiana – Patent attorneys for Plaintiff Stone Basket Innovations LLC (“SBI”) of Austin, Texas filed a lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas asserting patent infringement. The case was transferred to the Southern District of Indiana. Plaintiff SBI alleges that Defendant Cook Medical LLC (“Cook”) of Bloomington, Indiana infringed…

Updated:

Indiana Patent Litigation: Infringement of Collision Warning Patent Alleged in Indiana Lawsuit

Indianapolis, Indiana – Patent lawyers for Plaintiff Gary D. Pignato of Illinois filed an infringement lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana against Defendants Mobileye, Inc. of Jericho, New York and its parent company Mobileye N.V. of Jerusalem, Israel. Defendants have been sued on allegations of infringing U.S. Patent No.…

Updated:

Indiana Patent Litigation: Lilly Sues Alleging Infringement of Patented Osteoporosis Drug

Indianapolis, Indiana – An Indiana patent lawyer for Plaintiff Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana (“Lilly”) filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana. The allegations of infringement have been directed at Defendants Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. of North Wales, Pennsylvania and its parent company Teva…

Updated:

Federal Circuit Patent Litigation: En Banc Federal Circuit Retains Its Rules of Patent Exhaustion

Washington, D.C. – The Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, reaffirmed its rules of patent exhaustion in a 10-2 decision. It concluded that the Supreme Court decisions in Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc., and Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., did not require any change in the law…

Contact Us