Indianapolis, Ind. – Plaintiffs Cosco Management, Inc. (“Cosco”)
Plaintiffs ask for a permanent injunction against activity found to infringe the ‘805 patent, an order directing the destruction of all equipment used in the alleged infringement, damages up to triple the amount of the actual damages, costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees.
Practice Tip: It is unclear why Wing Enterprises, Inc. is listed as a defendant twice – once as Wing Enterprises, Inc. and again as Little Giant Ladders, an assumed business name. Various jurisdictions have held that it is acceptable to sue under an assumed name. For example, under Texas case law, one can sue an individual under his real or assumed name if he has filed an assumed name certificate and conducts business under that assumed name. See Employees Loan Co. v. Templeton, 109 S.W.2d 774, 778 (Tex. Civ. App. 1937). However, listing one party twice, whether as a plaintiff or a defendant, is traditionally viewed as unnecessarily duplicative.
This case has been assigned to The Honorable Judge Jane E. Magnus-Stinson and Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue in the Southern District of Indiana, and assigned Case No. 1:13-cv-0414-JMS-DKL.
Complaint – Cosco v Wing Enterprises
COSCO MANAGEMENT, INC. et al v. WING ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
Filed: March 12, 2013 as 1:2013cv00414 Updated: March 26, 2013 23:02:28
Plaintiffs: AMERIWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC., COSCO MANAGEMENT, INC. and DOREL JUVENILE GROUP, INC.
Defendant: WING ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Court: Seventh Circuit > Indiana > Southern District Court
Type: Intellectual Property > Patent