Indianapolis, Indiana – A copyright attorney for Dallas Buyers Club, LLC of The Woodlands, Texas has filed three additional complaints against Doe Defendants in the Southern District of Indiana. Two of these latest complaints include allegations against 20 separate as-yet-unidentified Defendants, while the third lists 16 new Defendants. The Doe…
Indiana Intellectual Property Law News
Indiana Patent Litigation: CeraMedic Sues Zimmer for Patent Infringement
South Bend, Indiana – Indiana patent lawyers for CeraMedic LLC of Plano, Texas sued for patent infringement in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer, Inc., both of Warsaw, Indiana (collectively “Zimmer”), infringed “Sintered Al₂O₃ Material, Process for Its Production and Use of the Material,”…
Indiana Copyright Litigation: Dallas Buyers Club, LLC Sues 24 Doe Defendants for Copyright Infringement
Indianapolis, Indiana – A copyright attorney for Dallas Buyers Club, LLC of The Woodlands, Texas sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that 24 Doe defendants infringed the copyright of the motion picture “Dallas Buyers Club,” which has been registered with the U.S. Copyright Office. The movie in question,…
Indiana Intellectual Property Litigation: Joe Hand Promotions Sues Johnson’s Tavern and its Owner for Unlawful Interception and Broadcast of Championship Fight
Indianapolis, Indiana – An intellectual property lawyer for Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. of Feasterville, Pennsylvania has sued in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Michael J. Casteel, individually and d/b/a Johnson’s Tavern and Casteel Enterprises of Galveston, Inc., both of Galveston, Indiana, unlawfully intercepted and broadcast the “Ultimate Fighting…
Indiana Patent Litigation: CeraMedic Sues Biomet for Patent Infringement
South Bend, Indiana – Indiana patent attorneys for CeraMedic LLC of Plano, Texas filed an intellectual property lawsuit in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Biomet, Inc. of Warsaw, Indiana infringed “Sintered Al₂O₃ Material, Process for Its Production and Use of the Material“, Patent No. 6,066,584, which has been…
Patent Office Issues 194 Patents To Indiana Citizens in June 2014
The U.S. Patent Office issued the following 194 patent registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in June 2014, based on applications filed by Indiana patent attorneys: PAT. NO. Title D707590 Race car D707483 Side rail D707480 Bed frame 8762766 Distributed fault tolerant architecture for a healthcare communication system 8762289…
174 Trademark Registrations Issued to Indiana Companies in June 2014
The U.S. Trademark Office issued the following 174 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in June 2014 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Reg. Number Word Mark Click To View 4556061 THE BRIDGE VIEW 4556052 STAY METRICS VIEW 4556051 STAY METRICS VIEW 4556027 ABRO VIEW 4556007…
Indiana Patent Litigation – Lilly Adds Panacea Biotec to List of Patent Infringement Defendants
Indianapolis, Indiana – An Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd of Tokyo, Japan; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. of Parsippany, New Jersey; and Ube Industries, Ltd. of Yamaguchi, Japan sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Panacea Biotec, Ltd. of New…
Terry Unveils Draft Legislation to Address Abusive Patent Demand Letters
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade Subcommittee Chairman Lee Terry (R-NE) (pictured) recently proposed draft text of legislation to address illegitimate patent demand letters. The legislation is designed to protect businesses from abusive patent assertion entities, also known as PAEs or patent trolls, while preserving the ability of legitimate companies…
Indiana Patent Law: Magistrate Declines to Grant Crime-Fraud Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege
Evansville, Indiana – In the matter of Berry Plastics Corp. v. Intertape Polymer Corp., Indiana patent attorneys for Berry Plastics Corporation (“Berry”) invoked the crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege, asking the court to compel Intertape Polymer Corporation (“Intertape”) to produce documents and testimony it had withheld as privileged. Magistrate…