Close

Indiana Intellectual Property Law News

Updated:

Patent Office Issues 111 Patents To Indiana Citizens in January 2014

The U.S. Patent Office issued the following 111 patent registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in January 2014, based on applications filed by Indiana patent attorneys: Pat No. Title D698,459 Container  D698,294 Motorcycle license plate  D698,220 Tubular lever  D698,175 Side chair  8,639,547 Method for statistical comparison of occupations by…

Updated:

Indiana Court of Appeals Rules in Favor of Resident’s Daughter in Nursing Facility Dispute

Indianapolis, Indiana – Alexis Hutchison (“Hutchison”) (pictured right) appealed a small claims court (“trial court”) judgment in favor of Trilogy Health Services, LLC, d/b/a Springhurst Health Campus (“Springhurst”), on Springhurst’s claim against Hutchison and her now-deceased mother, Martha Farber (“Farber”), for payment of services provided to Farber while she was…

Updated:

Lilly Sues Glenmark Generics for Over Proposed Manufacture and Sale of Generic Version of ALIMTA®

Indianapolis, Indiana – Indiana patent attorneys for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana (“Lilly”) filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Glenmark Generics, Inc., USA of Mahwah, New Jersey (“Glenmark”) infringed Antifolate Combination Therapies, Patent No. 7,772,209, which has been issued by the U.S. Patent…

Updated:

Sixteen Doe Defendants Alleged to Have Infringed “Charlie Countryman”

South Bend, Indiana – Michigan copyright attorney Paul Nicoletti, on behalf of Countryman Nevada, LLC (“Countryman”), sued in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that 16 unidentified John Does infringed the copyright of the motion picture “Charlie Countryman,” which has been registered by the U.S. Copyright Office. The movie stars…

Updated:

Eli Lilly Sues Par Pharmaceutical Asserting Patent Infringement of Effient®

Indianapolis, Indiana – An Indiana patent attorney sued in the Southern District of Indiana on behalf of Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. of Tokyo, Japan (“Daiichi Sankyo”); Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. of Parsippany, New Jersey (“DSI”); and Ube Industries, Ltd. of Yamaguchi, Japan alleging that…

Updated:

USPTO Ranks #1 in Best Places to Work in the Federal Government

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The federal government’s annual employee survey finds that the USPTO tops the list of 371 federal agency subcomponents. The U.S. Department of Commerce’s United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) was named number one out of 300 agency subcomponents in the 2013 Best Places to Work in…

Updated:

NCAA Heard in Federal Court Again on Antitrust and Right-of-Publicity Issues

Oakland, California – District Judge Claudia Wilkin (pictured) issued a new order regarding in re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litigation, a putative class action involving the Indianapolis-based National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”). The NCAA’s motion to dismiss on, inter alia, copyright and First-Amendment grounds was denied. In this…

Updated:

Virginia District Court Awards Attorneys’ Fees to USPTO

Alexandria, Virginia – The District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia held in Shammas v. Focarino that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) was entitled to recover attorneys’ fees when brought to court for a review of Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) rulings. An examiner for…

Updated:

Global Patent Filings See Fastest Growth in 18 Years

Geneva, Switzerland – A new World Intellectual Property Organization (“WIPO”) report  shows that in 2012 global patent filings increased at their strongest rate in nearly two decades as industrial-design registration notched its best-ever rate of growth. Intellectual property (“IP”) filings have sharply rebounded since a 2009 decline at the height…

Updated:

Fourth Circuit Affirms Districts Court’s Injunction and Admission of Evidence in False Advertising Case

Richmond, Virginia – PBM Products, LLC (“PBM”) sued Mead Johnson & Company, LLC (“Mead Johnson”) alleging false advertising in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(A) and (B), and commercial disparagement. Mead Johnson filed counterclaims against PBM. The district court dismissed the counterclaims and entered an injunction against…

Contact Us