Washington, D.C. – The U.S. Supreme Court recently decided a patent-royalty lawsuit, Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC. The Court, divided 6-3, ruled against Kimble. Stephen Kimble sued Marvel in 1997 for infringing his patent, U. S. Patent No. 5,072,856, with its “Web Blaster,” a toy that allowed users to mimic…
Indiana Intellectual Property Law News
Seventh Circuit Trademark Law: WD-40 Did Not Infringe “Inhibitor” Trademark
Chicago, Illinois – The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the ruling of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Western Division in the matter of Sorenson v. WD-40 Company, holding that WD-40’s use of “inhibitor” and a crosshair graphic on its product…
Indiana Trade Secret Litigation: Angie’s List Alleges Theft of Trade Secrets by Amazon Local and Employees
Indianapolis, Indiana – Indiana intellectual property lawyers for Angie’s List Inc. of Indianapolis, Indiana sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging theft of trade secrets. The Defendants in this litigation are AmazonLocal LLC of Seattle, Washington, Michael Albo, Kristin Baker, Dan Beary, Colton Bozigian, Jake Connerton, Adam DiVincenzo, Brandon…
Indiana Patent Litigation: Lilly Adds Mylan to List of Defendants Accused of Infringing Alimta
Indianapolis, Indiana – An Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Mylan Laboratories Limited of Hyderabad, India; Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. of Morgantown, West Virginia; and Mylan Inc. of Canonsburg, Pennsylvania (collectively, “Mylan”) infringed Patent No. 7,772,209 (“the…
Indiana Trademark Litigation: Trademark Infringement Litigation to Proceed in Federal Court
Indianapolis, Indiana – An Indiana state court complaint filed by Indiana trademark attorneys for 7E Fit Spa Licensing Group LLC, 7E Holdings 1 LLC, and 7E LLC was removed to the Indianapolis Division of the Southern District of Indiana upon the request of trademark lawyers for Defendants 7EFS of Highlands…
House Judiciary Committee Approves Patent Reform Bill by Substantial, Bipartisan Vote
Washington, D.C. – The House Judiciary Committee recently approved the Innovation Act (H.R. 9) by a vote of 24-8. This bipartisan bill takes steps to combat the ever-increasing problem of abusive patent litigation. The legislation addresses abusive practices taking place in federal courts. The Innovation Act is supported by a…
Seventh Circuit Copyright Litigation: Appellate Court Dismisses Copyright Appeal as Premature
Chicago, Illinois – Richard Bell, an Indiana copyright attorney and professional photographer appealed a ruling by the United States District for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The Seventh Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. In…
Patent Quality Chat Webinar: Face-to-Face Examiner Interviews and a Demonstration of USPTO Tools
Alexandria, Virginia – The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) will hold its next in a series of Patent Quality Chats on Tuesday, July 14th, with its second Chat on this month’s topic – Face-to-Face Examiner Interviews: A Demonstration of USPTO Tools hosted by Director of Technology Center 2400…
Patent Office Issues 194 Patents To Indiana Citizens in June 2015
The U.S. Patent Office issued the following 194 patent registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in June 2015, based on applications filed by Indiana patent attorneys: PAT. NO. Title D733,329 Wall panel D733,328 Wall panel 9071116 Apparatus for installing stator winding conductors 9070987 Connector with secure wafer retention 9070518…
Indiana Patent Litigation: Lilly and Lupin in Federal Court Anew, Patent Infringement of Axiron Now Alleged
Indianapolis, Indiana – In conjunction with non-Indiana co-counsel, an Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly Export S.A. (collectively, “Lilly”) and Acrux DDS Pty Ltd., sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Lupin Ltd. of Mubai, India and Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of Baltimore, Maryland infringed…