Close

Indiana Intellectual Property Law News

Updated:

Indiana Patent Litigation: Lilly Sues Amneal on Allegations of Patent Infringement of Axiron

Indianapolis, Indiana – In conjunction with co-counsel, an Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana, Eli Lilly Export S.A. of Geneva, Switzerland (collectively, “Lilly”) and Acrux DDS Pty Ltd. of West Melbourne, Australia sued for patent infringement in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Amneal…

Updated:

Indiana Trademark Litigation: Zip-A-Tee Sues for Declaration of Non-Infringement and Damages

Hammond, Indiana – James Cross acting pro se, and Zip-A-Tee Inc. of Michigan City, Indiana sued in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Coalition to Advance the Protection of Sports Logos (“CAPS”) of Coeur d’Alene, Idaho wrongfully interfered with Plaintiffs’ use of Plaintiffs’ intellectual property, including both trademark and patent…

Updated:

Indiana Intellectual Property Litigation: J & J Sports Productions Sues Multiple Defendants for Illegal Interception of Satellite Program

Indianapolis, Indiana – An intellectual property attorney for J & J Sports Productions, Inc. of Campbell, California filed four separate lawsuits in the Southern District of Indiana alleging the illegal interception of the satellite signal for the Manny Pacquiao v. Juan Manuel Marquez, IV Welterweight Fight Program (“Program”) broadcast on…

Updated:

Indiana Intellectual Property Litigation: DirecTV Sues Alleging Illegal Satellite Signal Interception

Indianapolis, Indiana – An intellectual property lawyer for DirecTV, LLC of El Segundo, California has sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging the illegal use of DirecTV’s satellite signal. Named as Defendants in the complaint are Rodolpho Flores, who has been sued as an individual and also as an…

Updated:

USPTO Roundtable: Ensuring the Accuracy and Integrity of the Trademark Register

Alexandria, Virginia – As part of the Trademark Operation’s continuing series of roundtable discussions to gather stakeholder views on important issues, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) will be holding a roundtable discussion of suggestions for ensuring the accuracy and integrity of the trademark register on Friday, December…

Updated:

Patent Office Issues 160 Patents To Indiana Citizens in November 2014

The U.S. Patent Office issued the following 160 patent registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in November 2014, based on applications filed by Indiana patent attorneys: PAT. NO. Title D718,427 Faucet  D718,072 Toothbrush tumbler holder  8897977 Variator control with torque protection  8897544 System and method for segmentation of three-dimensional…

Updated:

211 Trademark Registrations Issued to Indiana Companies in November 2014

The U.S. Trademark Office issued the following 211 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in November 2014 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Reg. No. Work Mark Click to View 4634184 LENSENSE Live 4646930 MEDICAL RESORT Live 4645273 BUSINESSES DON’T GROW, PEOPLE DO! Live 4645237 INCITE…

Updated:

Indiana Patent Litigation: Intex Recreation Sues Bestway for Patent Infringement

Indianapolis, Indiana – Indiana patent attorneys for Intex Recreation Corporation (“Intex”) of Long Beach, California filed a patent infringement complaint in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Bestway (USA), Inc. (“Bestway”) of Phoenix, Arizona infringed “Inflatable Flotation Device Having Removable Canopy,” Patent No. 6,749,474, which has been registered by…

Updated:

Indiana Trademark Litigation: Hoosier Momma Sues Founding Member Erin Edds

Indianapolis, Indiana – Indiana trademark attorneys for Hoosier Momma, LLC (“Hoosier Momma”) of Brownsburg, Indiana sued Erin Edds (“Edds”) of Marion County, Indiana in the Southern District of Indiana. In this Indiana litigation, Hoosier Momma accuses Edds of violations of the federal Lanham Act, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act…

Updated:

Indiana Patent Law: Method for Offering Video for Ad Viewing Is Not Patent Eligible

Washington, D.C. – In the matter of Ultramercial Inc. v. Hulu, LLC et al., a patent attorney for Ultramercial, Inc. and Ultramercial, LLC appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit asserting that the District Court for the Central District of California erred in granting Defendant…

Contact Us