Hammond, Ind. – Robert Payne (“Payne”) d/b/a Paynes Products, Paynes Forks and Payne Tools of LaPorte, Ind. sued Northern Tool & Equipment Company, Inc. and Northern Tool & Equipment Catalog Company, Inc. (collectively, “Northern Tool”) of Burnsville, Minn. for alleged violations of Payne’s intellectual property rights, false advertising and breach of contract.
The plaintiff complains of trademark infringement, palming off, false advertising and false designation of origin under Section 43 of the Lanham Act as a result of Northern Tool allegedly continuing to advertise and sell imitation Paynes products.
Finally, the complaint lists as separate counts one of the remedies sought – an injunction – and a count demanding a jury trial. We have blogged in the past about this method of pleading here.
Practice Tip: The occasional typographic error is no stranger to many types of documents, even legal documents. However, there comes a point where such errors erode credibility and hinder readability. This complaint had obvious errors on every page and probably in more paragraphs than not. Such drafting does not endear the lawyer to the judge – or the client – and should be avoided.
This case has been assigned to The Honorable Judge Jon E. DeGuilio and Magistrate Judge Andrew Rodovich in the Northern District of Indiana, and assigned Case No. 2:13-cv-109.
Complaint – Payne v. Northern Tool
Payne v. Northern Tool & Equipment Company Inc et al
Filed: March 27, 2013 as 2:2013cv00109 Updated: March 28, 2013 00:40:11
Plaintiff: Robert Payne
Defendants: Northern Tool & Equipment Company Inc and Northern Tool & Equipment Catalog Company
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Court: Seventh Circuit > Indiana > Northern District Court
Type: Intellectual Property > Trademark